Archive for the 'Puritanism' Category

Vindicated? Maybe not. Repeated, oh Yes!!

October 3, 2008

I have realized only of late, that the puritans suffered all they did, not just because of the Roman Catholics but also the Church of England. It was protestant against Protestant. That should not make it so suprising when I find I am suffering more than anyone else I know, also becausd of other protestants:

These intolerant and cruel transactions, instead of reconciling the Puritans to the church, drove them farther from it. such arguments were found too weak to convince men’s understandings and consciences; nor could they compel them to admire and esteem the church fighting with such weapons. These tragic proceedings created in the nation a great deal of ill blood, which alas! continues in part till this day. While the governing prelates lost their esteem among the people, the number and reputations of the Puritans greatly increased, till, at length, they got the power into their own hands, and shook off the painful yoke.

The the puritans in general were men of great leraning, untarnished piety, and the best friends to the constitution and liberties of their country, no one will deny, who is acquainted with their true character and the history of the times in which they lived. Many of them, it is acknowledged, were too rigid in their behaviour: they had but little acquaintance with the rights of conscience; and, in some instances, they treated their superiors with improper language: but, surely, the deprivation, the imprisonment, or the putting of them to death for these trifles, will never be attempted to be vindicated in modern times. [Benjamin Brooks]

Vindicated, no. But repeated, yes, a thousand times yes! It is exactly the same thing that has happened to me!

We Owe them so much

October 1, 2008

That was a phrase used in World War II about the soldiers who fought, and many of them lost their lives, defending our home countries, against the nazi regime. When our homelands are under any new or resurgence of any threat to our safety, the armed forced again, go out to try and nip it in the bud, and stop it becoming the devastating event and loss of human life that we had in the first two world wars. And we owe them so much is still a phrase that very often is upon our lips in these days, even all this many years after the Second World War Finished. We often hear it, in relation to the heroes of 9-11, how they risked life and limb for their fellow men. We do not hesitate to keep our guardes and fences and mark out our landmarks and boundaries and as soon as they are encroached, we pick up the baton that the soldiers of the first two world wars held so tightly, so that we keep the liberty they helped win us, and they didn’t lose their iives in vein.

Yet what about the same thing in matters of faith? How about those soldiers who have gone before us, whose courage knew no bounds for Christ and His cause and His Kingdom, and they sacrificed often with their lives. We do not have the same outlook about their legacy, and what they achieved for us, the liberty we now have in things of religion, that we do about the world wars. The evidence of that is all around us in every day life, and how the zeal has gone out of us. Yet, I respectfully suggest, we owe them so much too. As much or perhaps even more than we do the soldiers at flanders or who took on the Nazis, though their cost was also great. And that we should pick up their baton and defend the cause as soon as it is being encroached, every bit as much as we do, when our homelands are being threatened.

When you learn by what struggles these blessings have been acquired, and at what price they have been obtained, you will know how to estimate their value; and you will regard the men to whom we are indebted for them as distinguished benefactors to the English nation and the church of God.

For the sacred cause of religion, the Puritan divines laboured and prayed, wrote and preached, suffered and died; and they have transmitted it to us to support it, or to let it sink. With what feelings will you recieve this precious inheritance? Will you lightly esteem what they so highly valued? Will you stand aloof from the cause which they watched with jealous vigilance, and defended with invincible courage? If the blood of these men run in your veins, if the principles of these men exist in your souls, most assuredly you will not.

That you may learn the widom, and imbibe the spirit of the Puritans; that you may take them as a pattern and imitate them as examples,and follow them as guides, so far as they followed Christ;–that you may adhere to the cause of religion with the same firmness, adorn it with the same holiness, and propogate it with the same zeal, is the ferverent prayer of

Yours respectfully,
Benjamin Brooks
October 6, 1813

Puritan Burial Ground

September 23, 2008

The Above is John Bunyan’s tomb, in Bunhill Fields, the famous burial ground of the non-conformists during Puritan England, Though the ground also is the resting place for some kind of obscure reason of Suzannah Wesley, mother of Charles and John Wesley. But since Wesley’s chapel is just over the way from the burial ground, that may have something to do with it.

Immediately opposite Wesley’s Chapel is the nonconformist burial ground, in use for about 200 years before its closure in 1854. Denied burial in the “consecrated ground” of their parish churches, London’s Baptists, Presbyterians, Independents and Quakers were interred at Bunhill Fields and we can find the graves not only of many spiritual giants, but also those famous in other spheres including the writers Daniel Defoe and William Blake. [From England's Christian heritage]

Landmarks and Boundaries

September 18, 2008

Deut 19:14
Deut 27:17
Prov 22:28
Prov 23:10-12
Hos 5:8-10

Why the Westminster Standards are more important than ever today:

An image of the kind of person that the Westminster Standards type of Presbyterianism bred, in the lands of those times they were authored.

One person, describes The Scottish Peasant of those times, as the most remarkable man in Europe. Furthermore, the writer who said that, was an Anglo-catholic, rather than a Calvinist.

Dignity, intellect and character, of the typical Scottish peasant, largely flowed from the memorization of the shorter Catechism. They were far more equipped as a result of memorizing the shorter catechism, for conceptual thinking, than most 21 st century citizens of England or America.

They lived in huts, and toiled the land, wore kilts, and often seemed intellectually stinted due to their simplicity, in living, yet they are described as the most remarkable men in Europe. In the days when Education started to be esteemed and prized and sought after, it was the Scottish peasants, who were the most remarkable. And that was a result of the effect, of them memorizing, applying and believing, the Westminster Standards. What a man believes, so he is.

Nowadays, those entering the ministry are taught it, whereas it was written for children, and most 8 year olds in those days, had it memorized. How far we have fallen! What a tenth of their nobility we desire and should crave.

The covenanters had a strictness of life and behaviour and worship By that, I mean, they were a self denying lot in following the word of God. Their whole lives were regulated a by the Scriptures.

These men and women were courageous to the last. They had a high regard for people in need, and denied themselves to fulfil that need, and their courage seemed to know no bounds , as the list of martyrs shows us. They counted it a joy to sacrifice for the Lord. They lived in dangerous times, deadly times to believe and uphold the Truth of God that they did, but their actions proved by far more than speech, and didn’t only defend causes where they had very little to lose like we do today, in our self indulgent soft societies.

Calvinist’s in those days, were marked by a love of God and truth, justice, purity of character , and historically, they always shone in all these virtues above any other professing group of Christians.

One person wrote of the Calvinist’s of those times:

“We may with confidence maintain, that the world has never known, a higher type of Stalwart manhood, nor a gentler, purer, or more lovable womanhood, than has prevailed amongst those people in whose hearts and lives has entered the Calvinist creed. “

Rather than the slant that is put on puritans historically, and the spin, which distorts the truth, and calls evil good and good evil, and presents those men and women as harsh, severe, unloving fanatics, the above is the truth, and history bears witness to testify to the truth of it.

Do you think the Covenanters or Calvinists today are producing the same kind of character? I would say unhesitatingly, a resounding no! Some of those traits remain, but the ones that made them stand out a head and shoulders above others, is no longer the typical Calvinist or Covenanter, of either England or America. I get infuriated at times, by how much it is not true. How their luke warm sense of serving, is a joke as compared to those days. As to my mind, it disgraces the great, rich, noble heritage that the name today trades on, yet fails to live up to for the most part.

The Biblical picture we have of the true Christian home, is built on the standards and beliefs and practices of the Westminster Divines; they lived and breathed Scripture; the family homes were the nurseries of the church.

The democratic nations we live in, where the individual is upper most in importance, where political correctness is the emphasis, means Presbyterianism, built upon the Westminster Standards has been squeezed out. And man has become his own god. The landmarks and boundaries have not just been removed, they have been eradicated, as if they never existed. The covenants, made and swore to in Scotland, are no longer remembered, or even known anything about by most Christians in my country, even though it is their own country, that historically was at the fore of all these events.

Everything is now relative, on if it fits man’s taste, rather than us bending to God’s will, again, man is Sovereign of his own destiny, sovereign of our own behaviour and conduct, his own god. Discipline, both in our family homes, and self-discipline, is a dirty word. Practicing it, and denying ourselves, makes us no better than the monks, of trying to win God’s favour, by our works, rather than the truth being of simply being obedient to what God desires and doing it cheerfully. We need to separate from this world, whether in my country or yours, and become a little like Reformed monks. In the world, but not off the world.

Presbyterianism, as set forth by the Westminster Standards, give us liberty. Presbyterianism and Tyranny cannot co-exist.. The same is true of the true Calvinistic or Reformed faith. We don’t need to be genius’ or above intelligence any more than anyone else. Some of us are distinctly below the majority! But again, where Calvinism and ignorance meet, one of them leaves the field.

We have an heir to the throne here, who will have to change the constitution if and when he takes the throne, to not be Defender of THE faith, but to become as he has said he will, “Defender of Faiths.” And that all faiths are equal. That is a scary thought to my mind, and I also wonder if he will take the oath as his mother did before him at the Coronation, for her to uphold the True religion in Scotland, as that is still included in the coronation oaths. She apparently took it but her son plans to openly defy that. Christ is the ruler of the Kings of the earth, but Charles seems in some form to be resurrecting to some degree, the divine right of kings by what he proposes. As the Scripture references above clearly show, God pours out his wrath on the removing of the landmarks and boundaries, and I believe the spiritual decay and decline that exists in England is evidence of that.

All the men who just before the writing of the Westminster standards, who were at the front of upholding tyranny, like King Charles, I and Archbishop Laud, were executed shortly after the completion of the Standards, and tyranny started to be squeezed out. Tthose works of Westminster, gave us liberty. True Liberty. The only True Liberty is liberty in Christ, which we find in the pages of Scripture.

Most faiths are accepted in our society, on a live and let live basis. It is only the True Faith, the Reformed faith, based upon the Biblical teachings of the Westminster standards that today, makes for there being hostility against us. Universalism, popery, and arminianism, will be gladly tolerated. Yet try and tell people from a world view based on the Westminster Standards your point of view, you will not get the toleration or live and let live attitude you will be an outcast, someone who is causing “schism” because you hold to the truth, among the brethren here who hold to otherwise. Furthermore, the choice will have to be made, between pleasing the Lord and holding to the truth, or pleasing men, and your Christian brethren on one’s own doorstep, at the cost of betraying the truth you love. There is no contest! Yes, we need the courage, and nobility, of those Scottish peasants, that were so remarkable, even among the best of Christians, we are not prepared to go so far, or be as fierce and have the same goals and the same priorities. Our courage we leave behind the door, by comparison to protect ourselves and put ourselves first, which is why the easy way out of almost any situation, is the most oft chosen option. We are not prepared to suffer unduly, for either the Truth or the brethren. In doing so, we move the landmarks and make them shaky. The nobility that lived in a grass hut, among the Scottish peasants, in the fields of Scotland, put us to shame. They had so little, yet were willing to part with it all, even with dear life. We need to get our landmarks and boundaries put back in place. Only then, can or will England and America revive. And Scotland can once again glory, in the upholding of the Covenants!

“Art Thou not from everlasting, O Lord my God, my Holy One? I shall not die.’ Then, just before the end, he lifted the napkin from his face, and cried, ‘The Covenants, the Covenants shall yet be Scotland’s reviving!’ [from an account of James Guthrie’s martyrdom]

Landmarks and Boundaries

September 18, 2008

Deut 19:14
Deut 27:17
Prov 22:28
Prov 23:10-12
Hos 5:8-10

Why the Westminster Standards are more important than ever today:

An image of the kind of person that the Westminster Standards type of Presbyterianism bred, in the lands of those times they were authored.

One person, describes The Scottish Peasant of those times, as the most remarkable man in Europe. Furthermore, the writer who said that, was an Anglo-catholic, rather than a Calvinist.

Dignity, intellect and character, of the typical Scottish peasant, largely flowed from the memorization of the shorter Catechism. They were far more equipped as a result of memorizing the shorter catechism, for conceptual thinking, than most 21 st century citizens of England or America.

They lived in huts, and toiled the land, wore kilts, and often seemed intellectually stinted due to their simplicity, in living, yet they are described as the most remarkable men in Europe. In the days when Education started to be esteemed and prized and sought after, it was the Scottish peasants, who were the most remarkable. And that was a result of the effect, of them memorizing, applying and believing, the Westminster Standards. What a man believes, so he is.

Nowadays, those entering the ministry are taught it, whereas it was written for children, and most 8 year olds in those days, had it memorized. How far we have fallen! What a tenth of their nobility we desire and should crave.

The covenanters had a strictness of life and behaviour and worship By that, I mean, they were a self denying lot in following the word of God. Their whole lives were regulated a by the Scriptures.

These men and women were courageous to the last. They had a high regard for people in need, and denied themselves to fulfil that need, and their courage seemed to know no bounds , as the list of martyrs shows us. They counted it a joy to sacrifice for the Lord. They lived in dangerous times, deadly times to believe and uphold the Truth of God that they did, but their actions proved by far more than speech, and didn’t only defend causes where they had very little to lose like we do today, in our self indulgent soft societies.

Calvinist’s in those days, were marked by a love of God and truth, justice, purity of character , and historically, they always shone in all these virtues above any other professing group of Christians.

One person wrote of the Calvinist’s of those times:

“We may with confidence maintain, that the world has never known, a higher type of Stalwart manhood, nor a gentler, purer, or more lovable womanhood, than has prevailed amongst those people in whose hearts and lives has entered the Calvinist creed. “

Rather than the slant that is put on puritans historically, and the spin, which distorts the truth, and calls evil good and good evil, and presents those men and women as harsh, severe, unloving fanatics, the above is the truth, and history bears witness to testify to the truth of it.

Do you think the Covenanters or Calvinists today are producing the same kind of character? I would say unhesitatingly, a resounding no! Some of those traits remain, but the ones that made them stand out a head and shoulders above others, is no longer the typical Calvinist or Covenanter, of either England or America. I get infuriated at times, by how much it is not true. How their luke warm sense of serving, is a joke as compared to those days. As to my mind, it disgraces the great, rich, noble heritage that the name today trades on, yet fails to live up to for the most part.

The Biblical picture we have of the true Christian home, is built on the standards and beliefs and practices of the Westminster Divines; they lived and breathed Scripture; the family homes were the nurseries of the church.

The democratic nations we live in, where the individual is upper most in importance, where political correctness is the emphasis, means Presbyterianism, built upon the Westminster Standards has been squeezed out. And man has become his own god. The landmarks and boundaries have not just been removed, they have been eradicated, as if they never existed. The covenants, made and swore to in Scotland, are no longer remembered, or even known anything about by most Christians in my country, even though it is their own country, that historically was at the fore of all these events.

Everything is now relative, on if it fits man’s taste, rather than us bending to God’s will, again, man is Sovereign of his own destiny, sovereign of our own behaviour and conduct, his own god. Discipline, both in our family homes, and self-discipline, is a dirty word. Practicing it, and denying ourselves, makes us no better than the monks, of trying to win God’s favour, by our works, rather than the truth being of simply being obedient to what God desires and doing it cheerfully. We need to separate from this world, whether in my country or yours, and become a little like Reformed monks. In the world, but not off the world.

Presbyterianism, as set forth by the Westminster Standards, give us liberty. Presbyterianism and Tyranny cannot co-exist.. The same is true of the true Calvinistic or Reformed faith. We don’t need to be genius’ or above intelligence any more than anyone else. Some of us are distinctly below the majority! But again, where Calvinism and ignorance meet, one of them leaves the field.

We have an heir to the throne here, who will have to change the constitution if and when he takes the throne, to not be Defender of THE faith, but to become as he has said he will, “Defender of Faiths.” And that all faiths are equal. That is a scary thought to my mind, and I also wonder if he will take the oath as his mother did before him at the Coronation, for her to uphold the True religion in Scotland, as that is still included in the coronation oaths. She apparently took it but her son plans to openly defy that. Christ is the ruler of the Kings of the earth, but Charles seems in some form to be resurrecting to some degree, the divine right of kings by what he proposes. As the Scripture references above clearly show, God pours out his wrath on the removing of the landmarks and boundaries, and I believe the spiritual decay and decline that exists in England is evidence of that.

All the men who just before the writing of the Westminster standards, who were at the front of upholding tyranny, like King Charles, I and Archbishop Laud, were executed shortly after the completion of the Standards, and tyranny started to be squeezed out. Tthose works of Westminster, gave us liberty. True Liberty. The only True Liberty is liberty in Christ, which we find in the pages of Scripture.

Most faiths are accepted in our society, on a live and let live basis. It is only the True Faith, the Reformed faith, based upon the Biblical teachings of the Westminster standards that today, makes for there being hostility against us. Universalism, popery, and arminianism, will be gladly tolerated. Yet try and tell people from a world view based on the Westminster Standards your point of view, you will not get the toleration or live and let live attitude you will be an outcast, someone who is causing “schism” because you hold to the truth, among the brethren here who hold to otherwise. Furthermore, the choice will have to be made, between pleasing the Lord and holding to the truth, or pleasing men, and your Christian brethren on one’s own doorstep, at the cost of betraying the truth you love. There is no contest! Yes, we need the courage, and nobility, of those Scottish peasants, that were so remarkable, even among the best of Christians, we are not prepared to go so far, or be as fierce and have the same goals and the same priorities. Our courage we leave behind the door, by comparison to protect ourselves and put ourselves first, which is why the easy way out of almost any situation, is the most oft chosen option. We are not prepared to suffer unduly, for either the Truth or the brethren. In doing so, we move the landmarks and make them shaky. The nobility that lived in a grass hut, among the Scottish peasants, in the fields of Scotland, put us to shame. They had so little, yet were willing to part with it all, even with dear life. We need to get our landmarks and boundaries put back in place. Only then, can or will England and America revive. And Scotland can once again glory, in the upholding of the Covenants!

“Art Thou not from everlasting, O Lord my God, my Holy One? I shall not die.’ Then, just before the end, he lifted the napkin from his face, and cried, ‘The Covenants, the Covenants shall yet be Scotland’s reviving!’ [from an account of James Guthrie’s martyrdom]

Picking the Baton Back up

September 10, 2008

Are we Puritans?

It seems that the Puritans have enjoyed some revival, as far as people reading their voluminous works which are a rich treasure, still available to us today, in either the language they originally penned their treatises, books, sermons etc, or in re-prints, such as those that come out from the Banner of Truth. This is and can only be a good thing, for the church as a whole, that we are once again turning to the teachings of these spiritual giants, who were physicians to souls of the people of their times. And I would personally recommend for living the Christian life, to put our Systematic Theologies down somewhat, and pick up the works of the Puritans, who were the greatest Systematic Theologians we have.
However, those of us, who may hold the same beliefs as the Puritans in many aspects; those of us who exalt the same biblical teachings that they taught, and put a high price on those truths, and don’t think of them casually, there is often an error in our thinking, by thinking we today are puritans also and calling ourselves such. We may share their views, their holy lives, and their desire for reforming the church from within. But, for those who hold to the same Biblical worldview, represented most succinctly by the Original Westminster Standards, the same as the puritans of those times, cannot call ourselves puritans without adding the pre-fix Neo in front of it. The puritans belonged to a very specific time frame. That time frame started in the reign of Queen Elizabeth I and ended more or less with the death of Oliver Cromwell; anyone to come after that time period can never be puritans nor claim that name as it is, rightly for themselves. We may want to hold to their teachings, ways of life etc, in such esteem, that we want to associate ourselves with the rich heritage they left us. I think many Christians can understand that, and I think many Calvinist’s feel the same about John Calvin and Martin Luther and the like.
Charles Spurgeon is often thought of as an “honorary puritan,” because he was alive and kicking in the days after the puritan era had closed. He is never officially referred to as a “Puritan.”. He talked like a puritan, taught like a puritan, lived and worked like a puritan, but he still was not a true puritan, because he was born in an age when Puritanism, was no longer a term for people of his time. The same goes for Jonathan Edwards in American, and George Whitfield. We may see these people referred to as puritans, yet the label in actual fact does not belong to them and is not accurate any more than it can realistically be accurate for us to call ourselves puritans either. Their ministries were after the age of the Puritans. The term Neo-puritan, will represent Spurgeon, Edwards and Whitfield, and it will also represent us. I think these are important distinctions to make for us today. As many say they admire the puritans, without really seeming to know much about them, and it’s more like an associating oneself with something noble, that if we adopt their name, we can share in their nobility. Many Christians seem to do this no less with Christ, and the Puritans are probably second on the list only below Christ himself for this happening. It’s almost like a Christian badge of honour, yet the term in itself was derogatory and for ridicule, and it’s not true that we today, can call ourselves the same name as they, as “Puritans”, no matter how much we may realistically share with them in our Christian lives. We today, if we do share much with them, would be right to call ourselves, “Neo-Puritans.”
As I have said before, the puritans get a bad press. And the term puritan, was actually a derogatory term, to refer to a group of individuals who were misrepresented and the term was cloaked in sarcasm, and put downs, about the men included in that term. The term Neo-puritan today, is also similarly used. The term Puritan was a put down, not a badge of honour, or anything good or noble about it; it was used to poke fun and ridicule them with. They are often represented as someone (both then and now) who thinks themselves better than everyone else, who are fanatical, deranged even, and who are modern day scrooges when it comes to things like holy day observance, or the like. The puritans historically were largely represented as being so strict, and utter kill-joys that one would think if they cracked a smile, the only explanation could be they were either intoxicated, or mad or felt nauseous! How very unlike the truth that picture is. Yet it is a widely held to view, even among Christians today. The sad thing is, that groups who will represent in some part today, the teachings of the puritans, that in some cases, they seem to have that strictness, yet love gets squeezed out in favour of that strictness, when that attitude was far removed from the puritans historically. They were no clashing cymbals or gongs that enforced the law without the law of love also. They didn’t hold themselves as superior in any way, they were full of meekness and humility, which was lived out in their lives and showed by their actions throughout their lives.

Before I go on, I don’t wish to make it sound like these were perfect men and women. They weren’t. They were flawed human beings, just like you and I; there has only ever been one perfect human being, and that is whom they desired to serve, but their desire to put away the old man, and to humble themselves under the mighty hand of God, meant they had very little value upon themselves. They thought very little of themselves. And that concept is so foreign today in our cultures, where we are taught, self-eteem, and a dozen other self words, that this outlook is far removed from us today. That is one thing, we can definitely learn from them, and that we lack in leaps and bounds today, when comparing, point for point, ourselves with the Puritans of 16-17th Century England.

The Puritans, or non-conformists, were rebels at the time. The term non-conformist speaks for itself. These rebels who rebelled against the hierarchy who despised God and his mandates could not tolerate the excesses and ceremonies within the Church of England that were being enforced upon all churches, so they rebelled against it. They didn’t rebel against God in doing so, but the rules of Elizabeth I and her high commission, usurped the authority of God, so they justly, and in righteousness rebelled. The groups who believed the same way as the puritans, yet also believed the problem was not fixable, that it was a battle they could never win, the Separatists of that time, arrived in New England on the Mayflower. They were puritans too, but they didn’t want to try and change a problem that they deemed to be unsurpassable, and that they would be banging their head up a brick wall to no avail. However, when the Separatists took that step, of setting sail for New England, I doubt they ever dreamed that one day, down the generations that their off-spring would also be separatists, in an attempt to keep themselves from worship practices, that they had fled from England to New England for. And that some of these generations down, now were speatted from a Church, for the very same reason that their forefathers left England for New England. One may think that the term Puritan means Calvinist too, and in the overwhelming majority that may be true for their beliefs and practices. Yet there were also puritans who had other than Calvinist beliefs. There is one puritan, though his name currently escapes me, who was known as the Arminian puritan. Richard Baxter of course, was also little more than a confused Arminian. Yet, read his works, and see the man’s heart. See his holiness. Every corner of the puritan heart was devoted to God and his service above all. With very few exceptions, the Puritans were Calvinists, experimental ones. Their whole life, from getting up in the morning, to going to bed at night, was filled by the knowledge of God, and applying that knowledge to the whole of their lives, and putting that knowledge into practice, so that it was more than just head knowledge, but it lived in the heart, as active, life-changing knowledge. It was active, living, faith. Even what we dream when asleep, is covered by some puritans in their writings, as far as us being accountable for answering to God for sinful thoughts, etc. Whatever one thinks about that, it does demonstrate the point, that nothing, nothing in their life, or the scope of life, was left out of the notion of “how do we live to God,” for not just one day in seven, but seven days in seven, for 12 months in 12, for every year that we are alive, and every minute, every second of those days, months and years—In other words, the whole of life.
The Puritans it is well known are often thought of as kill-joys. People who wanted to stamp out any fun, or pleasure. Who were so severe at the thought of anyone having any fun or recreation, they would almost have an apoplectic fit. Yet little could be further from the truth! This representation was put around and has continued through the years, for no other reason than them once again being objects of ridicule. It was a way to put them down and jeer at them. Cartoons in popular newspapers, would and will often depict something using the term “Puritan” as a put down, and indicating to be one, is an utter disgrace, and you are a harbinger of gloom.

The best representation of this comes from the famous slogan, of which the author is unknown, which says, “A puritan is someone, who is afraid someone, somewhere is having fun.” The trouble is, that the age we live in, in which fun, entertainment and recreation are high in our priorities, that if you are more sober minded, not lent to such trivialities being the subject of your speech, such as the football game last night, or who won American Idol, that like the Puritans, even in our world today, you will be an outcast and shunned by society, as someone who doesn’t know how to have fun, or is much too caught up in seriousness, when we were after all put on this earth to have fun and enjoy ourselves, right? In a way, yes, but that enjoyment should come in all things, from the enjoyment of God. That doesn’t exclude the good things in life, the fun things, it just means that we should be moderate in the use of fun things, and should have our minds in heaven, and on eternal things, no matter what we are doing at the time.
The puritans and their teaching’s, however have stood the test of time, and as I said at the beginning of this essay, there is even some small revival for their works being read going on, largely thanks to ministries such as Joel Beeke, I believe.

The puritans sought to reform the church of the time, from within it. Rather than doing as the Separatists did, and leave for foreign soil, where they would have liberty to worship God as they felt was right, the Puritans stayed to fight against the excesses and ceremonies within the Church of England. Their Mayflower compatriots may have very well believed they did the right thing, and saw it rightly, and acted rightly by leaving England for New England, because the Puritans never won any of the battles they ever fought. BUT, the blood and the ashes from the fires of the martyrs won many a battle to change the hearts of the people who witnessed their martyrdoms.
These men and women, were living examples of the Power of the Word of God to change; the Power of the Word of God unto salvation. For as much as they desired to reform the church, the biggest reformation, went on within their own persons, their own families, their own lives, their own homes. These men stood as Spiritual giants, and it was the Sword of the Spirit that made them so. They were not ignorant Christians, who didn’t know what Scripture said, or barely knew. They lived, breathed and acted out what Scripture taught, because it was engraved upon their hearts, because the Word of God had utmost priority and reverence in their lives, and what they learned and gleaned from the Word they applied to their everyday lives. This is also something we can learn from the Puritans, and attain to aspire to. As it is rare, very rare, to find Christians who spends so much time in the Scriptures, searching out its secrets and depths, and who has such a thorough knowledge of its teachings as the Puritans did.
They were not only godly men, they were active men. They didn’t do as seems to be the norm in most of our modern books today, to turn out a couple of hundred pages, and sit back and watch the profits roll in. They penned their books by hand. There was no technology to make it easier, such as we have today. And rather than two hundred pages being the norm, many, many of those works, in their original format are short if they are six hundred pages. Richard Baxter’s Christian directory, runs at over 1,110 pages, and he wrote umpteen, and I mean umpteen works, and many of those other works of his were lengthy, lengthy works. Yet the well known ones we know best today turned out book after book. And it certainly wasn’t for the money or profit to be had in doing so in those times. It was a love for the Word of God, and their pastor’s hearts wanting to get that word out as far and wide as they possibly could. The whole of their lives were regulated by the Word of God. They went to bed early, as they had no electricity, so after a certain time at night, going to bed would be the only reasonable thing they could do. But they got up early, often at four or five in the morning, so that they gave God the first fruits of the day. Luther is said that he prayed an hour at each start of the day. When he was busier than normal, he prayed for two hours instead. That is the exact attitude we need to get back in our lives. Rather than I have x, y, z, so can’t. We all have limits, but relying on the strength of God rather than our own, then our weakness can be turned into his strength will make us doers. The puritans never stopped it seems, they were always and continuously doing the work of the Lord, in various ways. They often had large families, in those days it was the norm for large families, rather than small. And they never neglected their wives or children, there is not one single instance of divorce recorded amonst the Puritans, yet their workload was massive and that is why, given the way they regulated the whole of their lives upon the Word of God, that they achieved so much, even though they never won any of the battles they fought against the powers that be. They were strong Christians, mature, They were not doubled minded nor blown and tossed in the wind into other or different opinions. Their Bibles and their creed, mad their knowledge firm and sure and built upon the Rock. They held fast to the truth, because it was engraved upon their hearts after having spent so much time, studying and pouring through the Word of God. The Scripture says, that it has the Power to change, unto salvation. And given the high value that these men put on the Scriptures above anything else, that is why their lives were ones so well regulated by the word of God, and why they have left us a heritage we should not only take advantage of, by getting into some of their works so easily available to us today, but improving on that heritage, and not putting the baton down, as to do so, is to deride and mock the heritage they left us, as much as those who coined the term “Puritan” to mock and ridicule, and sneer at them. We may say we love the Puritans, and that may well be true. Only you can discern your own heart. But if we love them, then lets also imitate them. And be doers of the word, regulated in all spheres of life by the authority of the Word, and let us also leave a heritage, that in four hundred odd years times, the generations of those days, can find us and the heritage we leave, as usual and helpful as we do of that the Puritans left us.

This is part of my “The Puritan way” series and is to be continued.

The vision of Johnathan Edwards

February 4, 2008

Included in this post, is an audio file of a speech by John Piper. I am not a huge fan of Piper, as I think this thing of his of describing Jonathan Edwards, as a “Christian hedonist” is nothing beyong sensationlism, by the use of that term, in a different way. A way to attract attention, and get pews filled, much like hollywood does things to shock or sensationalized to get theartres seats filled out.

But even despite that, most teachers we are not keen on or disagree with on some things, can still have some insight that we can find common ground on.

Jonathan Edwards, really was another type of Christian to what we largely have today. And we should not learn about Jesus through the beliefs of Jonathan Edwards or any other Theologian, but only through Scripture though our own labour for our own selves–yet folks such as Edwards stand in history as examples of what it would be nice to attain to, as far as a life of faith. And Edwards knowledge of God, came from his pouring through the Scriptures hour after hour, and not just letting it wash over him, but by his actively reading rather than sadly is all too common amongst us, in passively reading. He hardly ever had a pen out of his hand. His thoughts about God as he read the Scriptures filled manuscripts by just random thoughts that occurred to him as he was reading and his jotting them down. The trouble with us, is that we are largely not thinking Christians in the way Edward was. We may struggle or wrestle with a thought that came to us from Scripture for a minute or two, and then we le it go. Whereas if like Edwards we had a pen in our hands, to write down our thoughts and interact with what we have read, then we could sustain the thought process about whatever it was much longer and get much further along in finding some resolution to the question or query we have. It takes self-discipline to discipline our thoughts in this way, and its not something you see today very much at all. But that is just one way, in which Edwards is a shining example to us all, that has nothing to do with what he may have believed about Jesus, but purely about his life of faith and the Christian life

Passive reading VS Active Reading

A manner of reading in which the reader is mentally engaged with a text and reads for comprehension and criticism as well as reads selectively and with a purpose.

Additional information
Active reading includes:

applying what you know (prior knowledge)
interacting with the author (responding critically to the text)
predicting (trying to determine the importance of the selected text)
solving problems (slowing to understand confusing passages)
summarizing (at the end of each page or where convenient)
In contrast, passive reading may be identified by reading for recreation, reading from start to finish, or reading with little mental engagement with a text.

Examples and resources
See Suzanne Micallef’s unit length lesson plan, Reading for Relevance in Literature with strategies to scaffold active reading of complex novels.

reading
marking passages significant to the reader
summarizing
analyzing the summary by generating a graphic organizer
further analysis: differentiating data for relevance by (re) categorizing and (re) grouping, and possibly modifying graphic organizer
synthesizing of analysis (from graphic organizers) by generating a Statement of Purpose for given chapters

http://www.learnnc.org/lp/pages/montecristo0705

The resolutions of Jonathan Edwards which came from those notes he took, while pouring through scriptures or meditating, are just one example of what can come from always having a pen in ones hand to extend and sustain the thought process and the discipline it took for him to be one of those thinking Chrisitans that sadly seem to be missing today.
Res. 28 of Edwards went thus:

Resolved, to study the Scriptures so steadily, constantly and frequently, as that I may find, and plainly perceive myself to grow in the knowledge of the same.

Not bad for just a note is it? Yet those notes and others made up and filled manuscripts, some of which still survive.

Below is the audio file of John Pipers speech at a Pastor’s Conference. There are some things I felt he misrepresented about Edwards, despite the expert in Edwards he seems to be, as he only gave half the picture which results in a very different picture to if the full picture is given. However, I will let the listener discern what may or may not be factual, and most of it was very good, despite my not choosing as a rule to read or listen to Piper. If theological issues I probably still wouldn’t; but biographical, I often make exceptions in those cases.

John Pipers speech on Jonathan Edwards at a Pastor’s conference. Click the above player to listen.


This is just an archive blog for personal use. For the proper blog when commenting is welcome and even encouraged please go to CRAZY CALVINST

Market day for the soul

January 26, 2008

I wondered for a long time, what Preparing for the Lord’s Day meant. I have friends online who would refer to this, and yet I never knew anyone in actual life who did so it remained a mystery to me.  And then of course, the puritan voice spoke, as the Puritans considered the Lord’s Day, to be “Market place for the soul.”  In many English towns and villages throughout history and sometimes even now continuing, there is one day a week, set aside for a market in the street in the town or village. People come and get bargains, they may barter a little, and yet normally manage to go home with a prized posession,  though it may well have taken the day, of getting to, attending,  and bartering for the prized object of desire.  And this was how the Puritans viewed the Lord’s Day.  That it was a day set apart in it’s entirety to devote to the Worship of God.  Public Worship of course would be part of that for many people.  Yet I saw this in my own  (even though somewhat limited) experience of attending church here in the UK, and though brief it was only three years or so ago I stopped doing so, as illness made it impossible to anyway.  People came to the Church service, soemtimes in the morning, sometimes evening, occassionally, if a special notable event maybe both.  But it was more like a teddy bears picnic than a place of Worship.  People were chattering, and had no idea that the minister was ready to start the service, and yes, of course this may be natural to some extent, except there would always be one or two, who even when the service had started and they could not not be aware would continue chattering, thinking in a hushed voice it would be unobserved or not really matter.  The sad thing is, I’m not referring to “seekers” either, but people who have professed faith for many years.    But after the service,  folks normally leave church and spend the rest of the day to themselves and God and His Worship is put firmly back into place. It’s what I tend to refer to as the One hour sunday Christians syndrome, though many of these people are no doubt sincere Christians.  

I am a Sabbatarian, I make no bones about that.  I won’t spend money at any outlet on the Lord’s Day; I don’t think there is any excuse to ever do so, unless an absolute emergency that cannot be avoided. I won’t do recreational things that would be perfectly okay to do on any other day.   And yes, I try to prepare for the Lord’s Day,  though it took me a long time to catch on what this meant.  Preparing all possible food that will be consumed on Lord’s Day on the Saturday.  Making the house tidy and respectable on the Saturday so that come Lord’s Day you don’t have to lift a finger in domestic servitude.   But I think the biggest job of the Lord’s Day is to prepare out hearts. To be in a right frame to give the day to God in devotion and worship and to come away with a blessing; the richest type of blessing–SPIRITUAL.  To fill oneself up, so that if you have a difficult week ahead, you will be sustained by having had your fill on this day and it will hold you rather than you perhaps floundering because you have been spiritually bankrupt as far as spiritual food, and are running on empty.  In those circumstances,  a knock, a hardship, suffering,  the week can become abysmal and you kind of go through the motions, trying to hold on until the crises passes, but  you have no real heart for it, as your heart is not enriched by God’s Word and HIs promises and assurances, so you are somewhat in a wilderness, a dry land.

“Legalist” often comes the cry of sanctifying and giving the whole day to God.  (Even given none of us keep it perfectly.). And legalistic is often the way the Puritans are viewed, in many many issues.  Of going too far, which can only mean further than Scripture disctates, so if that is the case before crying “legalists” please show from Scripture how these men whose sole life was given to not doing anything other than was actually contained within the pages of Scripture and nothing outside of God’s Word or will, and prove to me that they are doing as you say and “going too far.”

The neccessity of Sabbath keeping has not diminished.  Luke 23:55-56; John 19:31 to name just a few New Testament references.   And out of all the preparations which we must do, preparing the heart is the one that should take up our attention.  Going before God with a wrong heart, stops you praying with any depth of soul,  it makes communing with God on any real level impossible, and is just downright disrespectable to the Great God of Heaven.  And the puritans knew the value and importance of this:

 ”Go seasonably to bed, that you may not be sleepy on the Lord’s Day.”  [Richard Baxter]

And John Flavel from his exposition on the Westminster Assembly’s shorter Catechism.

Quest. 60. HOW is the Sabbath to be sanctified?

 A. The Sabbath is to be sanctified by an holy resting all that day, even from such worldly employments and recreations as are lawful on other days, and spending the whole time in the public and private excercises of God’s worship, except so much as is to be taken up in the works of necessity and mercy.

Q. 61. What are the sins forbidden in the fourth commandment?

A. The fourth commandment forbiddeth the omission or careless performance of the duties required, and the profaning the day by idleness, or doing that which is in itself sinful, or by unnecessary thoughts, words, or works, about our worldly employments or recreations.

Q. 62. What are the reasons annexed to the fourth commandment?

A. The reasons annexed to the fourth commandment are, God’s allowing us six days of the week for our own employment, his challenging a special propriety in the seventh, his own example, and his blessing the Sabbath-day.

Q. 1. What is the rest which God requires on the Sabbath?

A. It is not a mere natural or civil, but an holy rest, resembling the rest in heaven, wherein the mind is most active and busy in the work of God, though the body be at rest, and the spirit not wearied with its work; Rev. iv. 8. and the four beasts had each of them six wings about him, and they were full of eyes within, and they rest not day and night, saying, Holy, holy, holy, Lord God almighty, which was, and is, and is to come.

Q. 2. May not any works of our civil calling be ordinarily done on that day?

A. No; it is sinful to put our hands ordinarily to our callings on that day, and God usually punishes it. Neh. xiii. 15, 16, 17, 18. In those days saw I in Judah some treading wine-presses on the Sabbath, and bringing up sheaves, and lading asses, as also wine-grapes, and figs, and all manner of burdens which they brought into Jerusalem on the Sabbath-day; and I testified against them in the day wherein they sold victuals. There dwelt men of Tyre also therein, which brought fish, and all manner of ware, and sold on the Sabbath, unto the children of Judah, and in Jerusalem. Then I contended with the nobles of Judah, and said unto them, What evil thing is this that ye do, and profane the Sabbath-day? Did not your fathers thus, and did not our God bring all this evil upon us, and upon this city? Yet ye bring more wrath upon Israel by profaning the Sabbath.

Q. 3. May we not refresh our bodies by recreations, or our minds by thoughts of earthly business, or discourses, on that day?

A. Recreations of the body, which are lawful on other days, are sinful on this day; and all the recreations of the mind allowed on this day, are spiritual and heavenly; Isa. lviii. 13, 14. If thou turn away thy foot from the Sabbath, from doing thy pleasure on my holy day, and call the Sabbath a delight, the holy of the Lord, honourable, and shalt honour him, not doing thine own ways, nor finding thine own pleasure, nor speaking thine own words; then shalt thou delight thyself in the Lord, and I will cause thee to ride upon the high places of the earth, and feed thee with the heritage of Jacob thy father; for the mouth of the Lord hath spoken it.

Q. 4. What works may lawfully be done on that day?

A. Christ’s example warrants works of necessity, and works of mercy, but no other; Mat. xii. 3, 4. But he said unto them, have ye not read what David did, when he was an hungered, and they that were with him, How he entered into the house of God, and did eat the shew-bread, which was not lawful for him to eat, neither for them that were with him, but only for the priests. And ver. 7. But if ye had known what this meaneth, I will have mercy, and not sacrifice, &c.

Q. 5. What are the holy duties of the Sabbath?

A. The public worship of God; in reading, and hearing the word preached. Isa. lxvi. 23. And it shall come to pass, that from one new moon to another, and from one Sabbath to another, shall all flesh come to worship before me, saith the Lord, Luke iv. 16. – And as his custom was, he went into the synagogue on the Sabbath-day, and stood for to read. And prayer; Acts xvi. 13, 14. And on the Sabbath-day we went out of the city by a river side, where prayer was wont to be made, &c. And receiving the Sacrament; Acts xx. 7. And upon the first day of the week, when the disciples came together to break bread, Paul preached, &c.

Q. 6. Are private duties in our families required, as well as public, on the Sabbath?

A. Yes; it is not enough to sanctify the Sabbath in public ordinances, but God requires it to be sanctified in family and private duties; Lev. xxiii. 3. – But the seventh day is the Sabbath of rest, an holy convocation; ye shall do no work therein: it is the Sabbath of the Lord in all your dwellings.

Q. 7. With what frame of spirit are all Sabbath duties, both public and private, to be performed?

A. They are to be performed with spiritual delight; Isa. lviii. 13. If thou turn away thy foot from the Sabbath, from doing thy pleasure on my holy day, and call the Sabbath a delight, &c. And all grudging at, and weariness of spiritual exercises, is a sin forbidden; Mal. i. 13. Ye said also, behold what a weariness is it, and ye have snuffed at it, saith the Lord of hosts, and ye brought that which was torn, and the lame, and the sick; thus ye brought an offering: should I accept this of your hand? saith the Lord. Amos viii. 5. When will the new moon be gone, that we may sell corn? and the Sabbath, that we may set forth wheat, &c.

Q. 8. What is the first reason annexed to this command?

A. The first reason is the sufficient, and large allowance of time God hath given us for our civil callings, and earthly business. Six days in the week is a large allowance.

Q. 9. What is the second reason annexed to this fourth command?

A. The second reason is God’s sanctifying and separating this day by a special command and institution for his service; so that to profane this time, is to sin against an express divine command.

Q. 10. What is the third reason annexed to this command?

A. The third reason is God’s own example, who rested the seventh day from all his works, and blessed this day, by virtue of which blessing we are encouraged to sanctify it.

Q. 11. Is it not enough to sanctify this day in our own persons?

A. No; if God hath put any under our authority, their profaning the Sabbath will become our sin, though we be never so strict in the observation of it ourselves.

Q. 12. May we continue our civil employment to the last moment of our common time?

A. Except necessity or mercy urge us, we ought to break off before, and allow some time to prepare for the Sabbath, Luke xxiii. 54. And that day was the preparation, and the Sabbath drew on.

Q. 13. What is the first inference from hence?

A. That we have all great cause to be humbled for our Sabbath transgressions, either in our unpreparedness for it, our want [lack] of delight and spirituality in it, or the due government of our families as God requires.

Q. 14. What is the second inference from hence?

A. That Christians on the Sabbath-day have a fair occasion and help to realize to themselves the heavenly state, in which they are to live abstract from the world, and God is to be all in all to them.

And Matthew Henry, (tho this is only a tiny fraction of representation of the Puritan belief and practice as regards the Christian Sabbath)

The Sabath is a sacred and divine institution; but we must receive and embrace it as a privilege and a benefit, not as a task and a drudgery. First, God never designed it to be an imposition upon us, and therefore we must not make it so to ourselves.… Secondly, God did design it to be an advantage to us, and so we must make and improve it.… He had much more regard for our souls. The sabbath was made a day of rest, only in order to its being a day of holy work, a day of communion with God, a day of praise and thanksgiving; and the rest from worldly business is therefore necessary, that we may closely apply ourselves to this work, and spend the whole time in it, in public and private.… See here what a good master we serve, all whose institutions are for our own benefit. [Matthew Henry]

I struggle with this day, unutterably so at times, given my illness and aloneness in that illness and the hardness and affliction this day above any other entails.  Samuel Rutherford seems to have felt a very similar struggle each Lord’s Day when he was imprisoned at Anwoth.  But I am hoping and praying to go to market tomorrow, and barter  and work at getting the blessing Spiritually to come from that.  Are you too going to the Market day tomorrow? For your soul?

Studies in puritanism

January 24, 2008

Anyone who has read my blog for any length of time, knows I am a great, advocate, admirer and revere the teachings and lives of the puritans very much. I recommend anyone who has not yet perhaps read a single puritan book, to do so. A good one to start with for any Christian may be something simple and so heart searching as Richard Sibbe’s “The Bruised Reed.” I read it some time ago, it being one of the first puritan books I read, and plan to restart it again. Anyone who may struggle with assurance particuarly, this book it both appropriate and comforting material. “The Bruised reed he will not break,” [Isa 42:3] It makes the point that before we are bruised for sin, we are never fit for grace.

And as regular blog readers may have also observed, I have been reading much of J.I. Packers works and publications on the Puritans the last few months. “Quest for Godliness” and are currently making my way through his 5 volume series, “The Puritan papers,” which though he oversees and edits (I think) the contents, he only writes himself one or two dissertations in each volume, the rest of the contents coming from other theologians, such as Martin Lloyd Jones. But there are some audio files of Packer’s online here, for anyone wishing to study his thoughts on the puritans, they are free and accessible through ITunes. Makes sure you have ITunes installed, go to THIS LINK, click on “Church history” and the 17 audio files which makes around 11 hours of listening time can be downloaded and listened to. It may well be a good introduction, and it’s obviously free.

And as a third puritan note or recommendation. If like myself you need motivation, and tend towards procrastination with your reading aims, then you may see a link on the right hand side-bar about the “Puritan reading challenge.” If you decided to take part, this could be a way of reading to a schedule, and rather than planning to read books you never quite manage to get around to, then to actually get down and read them, as part of the challenge.

Anyone who believes that the Puritans and their teachings are not relevant to today’s Christians, I suggest you may want to think again. And before making up ones mind and shutting your mind to them, then at least find out why they are or are not, and try reading and studying them even if a little And see if after reading just one or two small paperbacks, if you still hold the opinion of them not “being relevant.” If folks are worried or concerned about the puritan mode of writing being old fashioned or their use of speech being a stumbling block to understanding them, I can honestly say I do not find this a problem. And many Puritan works are available in modernized paperbacks from places such as Banner of Truth anyway.

Puritanism today

December 20, 2007

It is often the critic of those against the Reformed Faith, or who may claim to be reformed but are not Reformed in the same way as Calvin or the Reformers were, but merely hold to T.U.L.I.P which is not the same thing at all, that Reformed presbyterians, are trying to recreate something impossible. Seventeenth century puritanism in today’s world. Or there may be Reformed blelievers who have a real love of the Puritans, who think that is what they should do to hold to Reformed theology in the Puritan tradition, and yet obviously can’t! Thinking its either what we want to do, try to do, or should do, when one thinks about it, is quite, quite ludicrous. Times change, yet people and their natures don’t. God nor His Word never changes. But with changing times, in whatever era, we still have God’s Word saying the same thing for ALL time. And the Puritans above anyone both past and present, are the people who represent the fullest works, on how to apply the Bible in our lives. Applying it in our lives today though in such a different world to the one they inhabited, means often something quite different and will look quite different to the lives of the Puritans. The teachings are the same. Life and the modern world though does not reflect 17th century England or Scotland. Abortion would be one issue that was not relevant then. Yet does the Bible not say much about the sanctity of life? That is one easy example of changing times and different values in the world we inhabit. Yet the Bible has an answer for it every inch as much as the things that impinged upon the lives of puritans and needlessly threatened lives. Whether that was at the hands of the papists or through huge impoverishment.

But, lets get this idea knocked on the head! Puritanism today, should and does exist. The values, and Biblical teachings of those men, still exist and should do, because they are contained within the pages of Scripture. But to think we can recreate ourselves as 17th century puritans in the 22nd century is quite the most illogical yet all too often prevailing thought. By both its critics and its admirers. It cannot be done. It should not be done. If we was to do that, we would all take ourselves off into some little isolated corner of the world, where the moden world we live in could not affect, invade or in any way reach us, and be hermits satisfied that we are doing everything we should as todays Christians by living such a life as that. The Puritans would be horrified, appalled and abhorred at such a thought. They were active men in their world of their time; in the Church, politics, social economic factors, everything that made up the world as it was. And todays Christians, whether puritanical in beliefs or not, should take a leaf out of their book, and be exactly the same way. Not indifferent in their own little nook, or in some self-imposed isolation or exile, away from the world, (is that even possible?) that makes us no better than the papists in monastries, but taking the teachings from Scripture which those great men, (and women too) lost so much and cost them so dearly to keep keeping on in making the teachings known, heard and applied.

As J.I. Packer wrote:

If we are to profit from studying Puritan teaching on this or any subject, our approach to it must be right. For it is all too easy for admirers of the Puritans to study their work in a way which the Puritans themselves would be the first to condemn. Thus, we can have a wrong attitude to the men; we can revere them as infallible authorities. But they would scarify us for such a gross lapse into what they would regard as papalism and idolatry. They would remind us that they were no more than servants and expositors of God’s written word, and they would charge us never to regard their writings as more than helps and guides to understanding that word. They would further assure us that, since all men, even Puritans, can err, we must always test their teaching with the utmost rigour by that very word which they sought to expound. Or, again, we can make a wrong application of their teaching. We can parrot their language and ape their manners, and imagine that thereby we place ourselves in the true Puritan tradition. But the Puritans would impress on us that that is precisely what we fail to do if we act so. They sought to apply the eternal truths of Scripture to the particular circumstances of their own day—moral, social, political, ecclesiastical, and so forth.
If we would stand in the true Puritan tradition, we must seek to apply those same truths to the altered circumstances of our own day. Human nature does not change, but times do; therefore, though the application of divine truth to human life will always be the same in principle, the details of it must vary from one age to another. To content ourselves with aping the Puritans would amount to beating a mental retreat out of the twentieth century, where God has set us to live, into the seventeenth, where he has not. This is as unspiritual as it is unrealistic. The Holy Spirit is pre-eminently a realist, and he has been given to teach Christians how to live to God in the situation in which they are, not that in which some other saints once were. We quench the Spirit by allowing ourselves to live in the past. And such an attitude of mind is theologically culpable. It shows that we have shirked an essential stage in our thinking about God’s truth—that of working out its application to ourselves. Application may never be taken over second-hand and ready-made; each man in each generation must exercise his conscience to discern for himself how truth applies, and what it demands, in the particular situation in which he finds himself. The application may be similar in detail from one generation to another, but we must not assume in advance that it will be so. And therefore our aim in studying the Puritans must be to learn, by watching them apply the word to themselves in their day, how we must apply it to ourselves in ours.
This point is crucial for us who believe that modern evangelicalism stands in need of correction and enrichment of a kind which the older evangelical tradition can supply. It seems that modern evangelicalism is guilty of just this error of living in the past—in this case, in the recent, late nineteenth-century past. We are too often content today to try and get along by rehashing the thin doctrinal gruel and the sometimes questionable ideas about its ethical, ecclesiastical and evangelistic application which were characteristic of that decadent period in evangelical history. But the answer to this situation is emphatically not that we should retreat still further, and start living, not now in the nineteenth, but in the seventeenth century. Such a cure would in many ways be worse than the disease. We certainly need to go back behind the nineteenth century and reopen the richer mines of older evangelical teaching; but then we must endeavour to advance beyond the nineteenth-century mentality into a genuine appreciation of our twentieth-century situation, so that we may make a genuinely contemporary application of the everlasting gospel.
Packer, J. I.: A Quest for Godliness : The Puritan Vision of the Christian Life. Wheaton, Ill. : Crossway Books, 1994, S. 233