Archive for the 'Against Heresy' Category

Don't step on my blue suede shoes of faith

December 17, 2006

rantKings of the time, swore their allegiance to the National Covenant and also the SL&C. (In some cases twice over!) yet to do so was for no more than to suit their own purposes. It was for their gain, and nothing to do with honouring God above man or honouring God, period.

Sometimes, the Reformed community can get a bad press, for how relentless we can be in defending the truth. By relentless I don't mean mean, or malicous, but certainly non-compromising.  And yet, isn't that what God calls any of us to do? I sometimes take a pop at the popish papal pope on my blog. For the reason alone of the papacy being the seat of the anti-christ. The great usurper.  And if I see truth compromised in a certain way, it will set my belly on fire, and I too will fit the label  of "relentless" in a passion to put right the wrong done to God's honour.

I think there are lessons from the National Covenant, for those of the faithful, to learn from.  There is obviously a right time to speak and right time to not on almost all occassions. However, sometimes, you just have to stand up and be counted.  I recently watched a movie/documentary called "Scottish Covenanters" and Richard Cameron was described as an "extremist."  and James Renwick (his successor) was described as a "zealot." Yet without these extremist zealot bents would either man have been equipped for the job to which he was called? And for which  both eventually died for?  Below are some excerpts from The National Covenant, with a few sundry comments of my own interspersed between paragraphs:

THE

NATIONAL COVENANT;

OR,

THE CONFESSION OF FAITH

Subscribed at first by the King's Majesty, and his Household, in the year 1580; thereafter by persons of all ranks in the year 1581, by ordinance of the Lords of secret council, and acts of the General Assembly; subscribed again by all sorts of persons in the year 1590, by a new ordinance of council, at the desire of the General Assembly: with a general bond for the maintaining of the true Christian religion, and the King's person; and, together with a resolution and promise, for the causes after expressed, to maintain the true religion, and the King's Majesty, according to the foresaid Confession and acts of Parliament, subscribed by Barons, Nobles, Gentlemen, Burgesses, Ministers, and Commons, in the year 1638: approven by the General Assembly 1638 and 1639; and subscribed again by persons of all ranks and qualities in the year 1639, by an ordinance of council, upon the supplication of the General Assembly, and act of the General Assembly, ratified by an act of Parliament 1640: and subscribed by King Charles II. at Spey, June 23, 1650, and Scoon, January 1. 1651.

 

——————————————————————————–

WE all and every one of us under-written, protest, That, after long and due examination of our own consciences in matters of true and false religion, we are now thoroughly resolved in the truth by the word and Spirit of God: and therefore we believe with our hearts, confess with our mouths, subscribe with our hands, and constantly affirm, before God and the whole world, that this only is the true Christian faith and religion, pleasing God, and bringing salvation to man, which now is, by the mercy of God, revealed to the world by the preaching of the blessed evangel; and is received, believed, and defended by many and sundry notable kirks and realms, but chiefly by the kirk of Scotland, the King's Majesty, and three estates of this realm, as God's eternal truth, and only ground of our salvation; as more particularly is expressed in the Confession of our Faith, established and publickly confirmed by sundry acts of Parliaments, and now of a long time hath been openly professed by the King's Majesty, and whole body of this realm both in burgh and land. To the which Confession and Form of Religion we willingly agree in our conscience in all points, as unto God's undoubted truth and verity, grounded only upon his written word. And therefore we abhor and detest all contrary religion and doctrine; but chiefly all kind of Papistry in general and particular heads, even as they are now damned and confuted by the word of God and Kirk of Scotland. But, in special, we detest and refuse the usurped authority of that Roman Antichrist upon the scriptures of God, upon the kirk, the civil magistrate, and consciences of men; all his tyrannous laws made upon indifferent things against our Christian liberty; his erroneous doctrine against the sufficiency of the written word, the perfection of the law, the office of Christ, and his blessed evangel; his corrupted doctrine concerning original sin, our natural inability and rebellion to God's law, our justification by faith only, our imperfect sanctification and obedience to the law; the nature, number, and use of the holy sacraments; his five bastard sacraments, with all his rites, ceremonies, and false doctrine, added to the ministration of the true sacraments without the word of God; his cruel judgment against infants departing without the sacrament; his absolute necessity of baptism; his blasphemous opinion of transubstantiation, or real presence of Christ's body in the elements, and receiving of the same by the wicked, or bodies of men; his dispensations with solemn oaths, perjuries, and degrees of marriage forbidden in the word; his cruelty against the innocent divorced; his devilish mass; his blasphemous priesthood; his profane sacrifice for sins of the dead and the quick; his canonization of men; calling upon angels or saints departed, worshipping of imagery, relicks, and crosses; dedicating of kirks, altars, days; vows to creatures; his purgatory, prayers for the dead; praying or speaking in a strange language, with his processions, and blasphemous litany, and multitude of advocates or mediators; his manifold orders, auricular confession; his desperate and uncertain repentance; his general and doubtsome faith; his satisfaction of men for their sins; his justification by works, opus operatum, works of supererogation, merits, pardons, peregrinations, and stations; his holy water, baptizing of bells, conjuring of spirits, crossing, sayning, anointing, conjuring, hallowing of God's good creatures, with the superstitious opinion joined therewith; his worldly monarchy, and wicked hierarchy; his three solemn vows, with all his shavelings of sundry sorts; his erroneous and bloody decrees made at Trent, with all the subscribers or approvers of that cruel and bloody band, conjured against the kirk of God.And finally, we detest all his vain allegories, rites, signs, and traditions brought in the kirk, without or against the word of God, and doctrine of this true reformed kirk; to the which we join ourselves willingly, in doctrine, faith, religion, discipline, and use of the holy sacraments, as lively members of the same in Christ our head: promising and swearing, by the great name of the LORD our GOD, that we shall continue in the obedience of the doctrine and discipline of this kirk [The Confession which was subscribed at Halyrud-house the 25th of February 1587-8, by the King, Lennox Huntly, the Chancellor, and about 95 other persons, hath here added, "Agreeing to the word." Sir John Maxwell of Pollock hath the original parchment.], and shall defend the same, according to our vocation and power, all the days of our lives; under the pains contained in the law, and danger both of body and soul in the day of God's fearful judgment.

And seeing that many are stirred up by Satan, and that Roman Antichrist, to promise, swear, subscribe, and for a time use the holy sacraments in the kirk deceitfully, against their own conscience; minding hereby,first, under the external cloak of religion, to corrupt and subvert secretly God's true religion within the kirk; and afterward, when time may serve, to become open enemies and persecutors of the same, under vain hope of the Pope's dispensation, devised against the word of God, to his greater confusion, and their double condemnation in the day of the Lord Jesus: we therefore, willing to take away all suspicion of hypocrisy, and of such double dealing with God, and his kirk, protest, and call the Searcher of all hearts for witness, that our minds and hearts do fully agree with this our Confession, promise, oath, and subscription: so that we are not moved with any worldly respect, but are persuaded only in our conscience, through the knowledge and love of God's true religion imprinted in our hearts by the Holy Spirit, as we shall answer to him in the day when the secrets of all hearts shall be disclosed.

And because we perceive, that the quietness and stability of our religion and kirk doth depend upon the safety and good behaviour of the King's Majesty, as upon a comfortable instrument of God's mercy granted to this country, for the maintaining of his kirk, and ministration of justice amongst us; we protest and promise with our hearts, under the same oath, hand-writ, and pains, that we shall defend his person and authority with our goods, bodies, and lives, in the defence of Christ, his evangel, liberties of our country, ministration of justice, and punishment of iniquity, against all enemies within this realm or without, as we desire our God to be a strong and merciful defender to us in the day of our death, and coming of our Lord Jesus Christ; to whom, with the Father, and the Holy Spirit, be all honour and glory eternally. Amen.

If ever there was a reason to be against papistry, the above when one measures the above in light of Scripture and what Scripture teaches about both the seat of the anti-Christ and also Romish practices and ceremonies, (extra Biblical) can only make one against the papacy and all it stands for.  Of course it doesn't just include papistry, but against any religion where God is dishnoured, and heresy is present. 

do condemn the monuments and dregs of bygone idolatry, as going to crosses, observing the festival days of saints, and such other superstitious and Papistical rites, to the dishonour of God, contempt of true religion, and fostering of great error among the people; and ordains the users of them to be punished for the second fault, as idolaters, Act 104, Parl.7, King James VI.

This is one reason I am often so out-spoken about the observance of so called "holy days."  As men fought and died for the Christian liberty we now have to not be subject to man's will upon us, but only the will of God.  Being bound to "holy days" is only being subject to the will of man, and not God. And I object-LOUDLY- when it cost those of that era so much, in life and limb, to fight for the right we now have to choose in our Christian liberty. To put ourselves in bondage by choice,  is an affront on many levels. 

And the subsequent Act 69, Parl. 6 of King James VI. declares, that there is no other face of kirk, nor other face of religion, than was presently at that time, by the favour of God, established within this realm: "Which therefore is ever styled God's true religion, Christ's true religion, the true and Christian religion, and a perfect religion;" which, by manifold Acts of Parliament, all within this realm are bound to profess, to subscribe the articles thereof, the Confession of Faith, to recant all doctrine and errors repugnant to any of the said articles, Act 4 and 9, Parl. 1; Acts 45,46,47, Parl. 3; Act 71, Parl. 6; Act 106, Parl. 7; Act 24, Parl. 11; Act 123, Parl. 12; Act 194 and 197, Parl. 14 of King James VI. And all magistrates, sheriffs, &c. on the one part, are ordained to search, apprehend, and punish all contraveners: For instance, Act 5, Parl. 1; Act 104, Parl. 7; Act 25, Parl. 11, King James VI.; and that notwithstanding of the King's Majesty's licences on the contrary, which are discharged, and declared to be of no force, in so far as they tend in any wise to the prejudice and hinder of the execution of the Acts of Parliament against Papists and adversaries of true religion, Act 106, Parl. 7, King James VI. On the other part, in the 47th Act, Parl. 3, King James VI. it is declared and ordained, Seeing the cause of God's true religion and his Highness's authority are so joined, as the hurt of the one is common to both; that none shall be reputed as loyal and faithful subjects to our sovereign Lord, or his authority, but be punishable as rebellers and gainstanders of the same, who shall not give their confession, and make their profession of the said true religion: and that they who, after defection, shall give the confession of their faith of new, they shall promise to continue therein in time coming, to maintain our sovereign Lord's authority, and at the uttermost of their power to fortify, assist, and maintain the true preachers and professors of Christ's religion, against whatsoever enemies and gainstanders of the same; and namely, against all such, of whatsoever nation, estate, or degree they be of, that have joined or bound themselves, or have assisted, or assist, to set forward and execute the cruel decrees of the council of Trent, contrary to the true preachers and professors of the word of God; which is repeated, word by word, in the articles of pacification at Perth, the 23d of February 1572, approved by Parliament the last of April 1573, ratified in Parliament 1587, and related Act 123, Parl. 12 of King James VI.; with this addition, "That they are bound to resist all treasonable uproars and hostilities raised against the true religion, the King's Majesty, and the true professors.

You see these men, and women were more than professors. They put their  money where their mouth was and did not compromise for the truth for the sake of some trivial temporal blessing or yet still any greater temporal blessing.  Of course there were those of the time of weaker faith, less graces,  and so forth who did compromise, and sided with the Royalists,  but they SHOULDN'T have.  Yet in those times of persecution, will anyone really say they can blame them? Or that they know for sure if it were them in such perilous times they would do any different? But we are NOT in such perilous times any more. To compromise on any level, big or small on matters such as some of these, is abominable, and if it comes from within the Reformed Community, a smear and slur on these martyrs memories.  Who set Christ as their King, before any man, woman, child, and enduring bodily torture that tore and crushed their bodies in little bits they still would not and did not recant or waver from the truth.  After such torturous experiences when weakened beyond bounds, they then further went to the scaffold, (or some other mode of execution) and were still upholding truth and glorifying Christ, with their final breath. Many a martyr sang in the fire as the flames engulfed him. All of them were heard to utter, "Lord, I commend my spirit" as the last words their lips uttered. I take offense at such carelessness in this day and age, because I believe the martyrs/puritans/covenanters are the only people I have any connection with, (by reading them) who would understand the struggle my life and a life of faith entails every single day in the degree of suffering I have.  So, yes, I take offense on their behalf when their graves are spat upon, when the easy option, or the compromise is taken instead of truth. What was the Reformation about EXCEPT truth?  If any calling themselves Reformed Christians in todays safe comfort zone, will take an easy option or compromise, when the word REformed comes from the REformation and such suffering times, do you really have any right to lay hold to the title Reformed?  So, yes my blood boils at times,  and I get a fire in my belly that won't go out until truth has been heard and both God's honour and the taint upon the men and women who died for their faith has tried to be erased or cleansed.   Maybe I am an extremist, or a zealot in some ways over some things, but maybe like Richard Cameron or James Fenwick, its because I know the reality of suffering beyond most humans understanding in the usual run or life and circumstances, into the bounds of what Calvin termed "extraordinary suffering," in which he meant it is not usual for most of man-kind and outside of most normal human experience.  Maybe that's why when compromise at such a small price to pay for not compromising and defending God's honour, is why  when  God is dishonoured by such compromise and the graves of the martyrs spat upon at the same time,  it will always be stepping on my blue suede shoes of faith. And the fire will get lit, that  will take some putting out,  until the balance has been redressed.

Why I take a hard line against heresy

December 5, 2006

If any of my current readers have been in any of the groups I am in recently they may have seen that I have taken a very hard line about one individual who I see as a raving mad fanatical heretic. (An Anti-Trinitarian)  The reason I take this line,  amongst other reasons, and also don't bandy words if as I see true Christians compromising either God or their faith, or the Reformed faith,  is because of the reasons in this previous blog post.  To shake hands and buddy up to them, at times, is spitting on the graves of the martyrs,  let alone One who is Higher than any of us,  and is TRUTH.  And I won't sit idly by and keep quiet when I see it as such,  so if it offends,  then I make no apologies.  As I'm doing what I see as right, and honourable in those scenarios.

I don't throw the baby out with the bathwater and say we should always reject and avoid all such people.  (such as anti-trinitarians) but you have to draw the line somewhere. And when you are called anti-christ by one of them, and see their full mad fanatical selves in play,  ones options are very limited, and the lines in the sand very clear I think.

As George Gillepsie the Westminster divine said on such things:

 

"We must not think that no man is a heretic but he who is   consistorially or judicially admonished, and thereafter continueth pertinaciously in his   error; for where it is said, Tit. 3.10, “A man that is an heretic, after the first   and second admonition, reject,’’ it is intimated that he was an heretic before such   admonition."

And Again

It is an error professed and maintained, and which, by that means,   becomes a scandal and snare to others. For although there may be heresy (as well as other   kinds of sin) lurking and hid in the thoughts, yet that belongs to God’s judgment only,   not to man’s. The heresies which are spoken of, 1 Cor. 11.9, are certainly known, and   apparently discriminative, even among men. And heretics are scandalous persons, to be   avoided and rejected, Rom. 16.17; Tit. 3.10; which could not be except their errors were   known."

 

On The Trinity

September 27, 2006

Q: What is meant by affirming Christ is the Eternal Son of God?

A: By affirming that Christ is the Eternal Son of God, we mean that he has always been the Son of God, the Second Person of the Divine Trinity from all eternity. He did not become the Son of God when he became man nor at any time in history of the created universe.

Q: Whatr is meant by affirming that Christ is one substance with the Father?

A: By affirming that Christ is of one substances with the Father, we mean that her is only one God, and Jesus Christ is this one God just  as truly as the Father is this one God. As Christians we do not believe in three God’s, but in one God who exists in three persons: the Father, the Son, and the Holy Spirit. Jesus Christ is therfore notlike God; he is God, the only God that ther is. In Him dwells not a p art of the fullness of the Godhead bodily, but all the fullness of the Godhead bodily (col 2:9)

Q: What is mean by affirming that Christ is equal with the Father?

A: By affirmng that Christ is equal with the Father, we mean that so far as his nature is concerned, Christ is not subordinate to the Father in any way. By rason of his self-humilation, during his life on earth, he was subordinate to the Father in position, for he took upon him the form of a servant. But in nature, even during his life on earth, he was, and is today, fully equal with God the Father. [Johannes G. Vos]

 

Calvin-Dictator of Geneva-Myth or fact?

September 18, 2006

I had occassion to come across some strange beliefs about John Calvin and Michael Servetus earlier this year. At one point when discussing Reformation theology with this group, I rather stupidly or naievly used the term "True Religion" which set some fires raging. For anyone who witnessed that discussion who didn't not understand why I used that term, I suggest this quote of Thomas Watson's gives a clear, concise explanation. But they sure did see Michael Servetus through rose-coloured spectacles while choosing to believe ill-founded propaganda about John Calvin. John CalvinIn this post I am setting a few things straight. The facts of which can easily be varified by various historical sources.

Isn't that what most people are taught or hear? Isn't that what the ill-informed or those who are strictly against Reformation Principles are happy to embrace as the truth as it often aids there anti-reformation beliefs? Didn't John Calvin murder Michael Servetus, isn't that another string to the bow of anti-Calvin-anti-Reformation lines of beliefs and thought?

Yet, what is the truth of these matters?

John Calvin himself far from having any power in Geneva was banished from it, by the authorties (the council in this case) for adhereing to strict church discipline and when he wasn't able to enforce that, because the authorities denied him being able to do so he withdrew from adminstering the Lord's Supper along with William Farrel and they were both banished. Both seen as spies for the French who had been bough in to Geneva to infiltrate and eventually over-throw it.

When after years in exile after his banishment the authorities in Geneva begged Calvin to return because of the moral decline it had taken, Calvin wrote in a letter to William Farrel with his former experiences in Geneva in mind, which had included his house being stoned, harassment and persecution: "Whenever I call to mind the wretchedness of my life in Geneva, how can it not be that my very soul must shudder at any proposals for my return?" Calvin endured his house being stoned and harassment etc, while suffering chronic ill health. The last thing anyone needs with his various maladies is external stress that can be avoided. These included but is not an exhaustive list: Gout, kidney stones, Tuberculosis, lying in bed was painful for him, eating was distasteful to him, wine was bitter to him.

But Calvin the powerful megalomaniac tyrant and dictator of Geneva, is what we often hear bandied about. Yet despite the charges that he had great wealth, Calvin wrote that he did not possess one foot of land and had not enough money to buy one acre, and said he was still using someone else's furniture. "Neither the table at which we eat, nor the bed on which we sleep is my own" and neither did he own the house he lived in.

Michael Servetus though he had a brilliant mind and was the first man to map out the arterial system of the body being a medical doctor, was a heretic and a dangerous one. He was an anti-trinitarian who also translated in part his own edition of the Bible in which he stripped out from the Old Testament all prophecies of Christ. Calvin tried unsuccessfully to witness to Servetus throughout his life. If Michael Servetus had have had his way, he would not have just overthrown the Reformation before it even began he would have also done away with Roman Catholicism, and left a city and ultimately a fire to spread that left a world bereft of all faith. Eventually Servetus was arrested and tried and found guilty and sentenced to be executed by burning. Calvin pleaded and entreated the authorities to choose a more humane way of executing him than by fire. But Calvin had so little influence in the running of Geneva or sway with the authorities that even this plea went unanswered. If the man had have had the power to arrest and ultimately execute Servetus he would have had no problem in stating the form of execution to take place. But he had no power with them at all. He never held public office of any kind, he couldn't arrest or sentence anyone.

So, the dictator of Geneva as many like to bandy about willy nilly about John Calvin is unfounded and frankly quite an ignorant and ill-informed, maybe in some cases willfully blind because to believe he was suits anti-reformation principles with Calvin at the helm of their antagonism cos Reformation faith bears his name.

Calvin-Dictator of Geneva-Myth or fact?

September 18, 2006

I had occassion to come across some strange beliefs about John Calvin and Michael Servetus earlier this year. At one point when discussing Reformation theology with this group, I rather stupidly or naievly used the term "True Religion" which set some fires raging. For anyone who witnessed that discussion who didn't not understand why I used that term, I suggest this quote of Thomas Watson's gives a clear, concise explanation. But they sure did see Michael Servetus through rose-coloured spectacles while choosing to believe ill-founded propaganda about John Calvin. John CalvinIn this post I am setting a few things straight. The facts of which can easily be varified by various historical sources.

Isn't that what most people are taught or hear? Isn't that what the ill-informed or those who are strictly against Reformation Principles are happy to embrace as the truth as it often aids there anti-reformation beliefs? Didn't John Calvin murder Michael Servetus, isn't that another string to the bow of anti-Calvin-anti-Reformation lines of beliefs and thought?

Yet, what is the truth of these matters?

John Calvin himself far from having any power in Geneva was banished from it, by the authorties (the council in this case) for adhereing to strict church discipline and when he wasn't able to enforce that, because the authorities denied him being able to do so he withdrew from adminstering the Lord's Supper along with William Farrel and they were both banished. Both seen as spies for the French who had been bough in to Geneva to infiltrate and eventually over-throw it.

When after years in exile after his banishment the authorities in Geneva begged Calvin to return because of the moral decline it had taken, Calvin wrote in a letter to William Farrel with his former experiences in Geneva in mind, which had included his house being stoned, harassment and persecution: "Whenever I call to mind the wretchedness of my life in Geneva, how can it not be that my very soul must shudder at any proposals for my return?" Calvin endured his house being stoned and harassment etc, while suffering chronic ill health. The last thing anyone needs with his various maladies is external stress that can be avoided. These included but is not an exhaustive list: Gout, kidney stones, Tuberculosis, lying in bed was painful for him, eating was distasteful to him, wine was bitter to him.

But Calvin the powerful megalomaniac tyrant and dictator of Geneva, is what we often hear bandied about. Yet despite the charges that he had great wealth, Calvin wrote that he did not possess one foot of land and had not enough money to buy one acre, and said he was still using someone else's furniture. "Neither the table at which we eat, nor the bed on which we sleep is my own" and neither did he own the house he lived in.

Michael Servetus though he had a brilliant mind and was the first man to map out the arterial system of the body being a medical doctor, was a heretic and a dangerous one. He was an anti-trinitarian who also translated in part his own edition of the Bible in which he stripped out from the Old Testament all prophecies of Christ. Calvin tried unsuccessfully to witness to Servetus throughout his life. If Michael Servetus had have had his way, he would not have just overthrown the Reformation before it even began he would have also done away with Roman Catholicism, and left a city and ultimately a fire to spread that left a world bereft of all faith. Eventually Servetus was arrested and tried and found guilty and sentenced to be executed by burning. Calvin pleaded and entreated the authorities to choose a more humane way of executing him than by fire. But Calvin had so little influence in the running of Geneva or sway with the authorities that even this plea went unanswered. If the man had have had the power to arrest and ultimately execute Servetus he would have had no problem in stating the form of execution to take place. But he had no power with them at all. He never held public office of any kind, he couldn't arrest or sentence anyone.

So, the dictator of Geneva as many like to bandy about willy nilly about John Calvin is unfounded and frankly quite an ignorant and ill-informed, maybe in some cases willfully blind because to believe he was suits anti-reformation principles with Calvin at the helm of their antagonism cos Reformation faith bears his name.

The House of Yaweh—Sooo credible!

September 17, 2006

The House of Yaweh are soo credible!!
According to the cult, sect, The house of Yaweh, the end of the world should have begun on September 12th, owing to nuclear destruction in South Carolina. Are any readers in South Carolina? If so, are you managing to dodge the nuclear missiles as they fly over head?

Anyway, this is what they say on their website:

The Days After September 12, 2006

The inspired prophecies show that the world will experience nuclear war in and around the great river Euphrates that will involve two great armies and kill a third part of man over a fourth part of the earth.

The days following September 12, 2006 will be filled with fear of reprisal and more nuclear destruction. The cause of war and fighting will still remain; as long as the cause remains so will the threat of war. The cause is plainly shown in the inspired prophecies from Genesis to Revelation.

The Prophet Isayah was inspired to write that the cause of what we see taking place now in 2006, which will grow much worse in 2007, is the breaking of Yahweh Laws.

Isayah 24:1-6—
1 Before Yahweh's very eyes, the earth is made empty and it is made waste; the face of it is perverted and its inhabitants scattered abroad;
2 And it will be: as with the people, so with the priest; as with the servant, so with his owner; as with the maid, so with her mistress; as with the buyer, so with the seller; as with the lender, so with the borrower; as with him who takes usury, so with him who gives usury to him:
3 The land will be utterly emptied and utterly plundered, for it has come to pass that this judgment has been pronounced.
4 The earth mourns and fades away, the world mourns and fades away, and the haughty people of the earth languish.
5 The earth also is defiled because of the inhabitants of it, for they have transgressed the Laws, changed the ordinance, and broken the everlasting covenant.
6 Because of this, the curse has devoured the earth, and they who dwell therein are desolate; therefore, the inhabitants of the earth are burned, and few men left.

I know that what follows will sound strange to most of you but I beg you to study all of this information very closely, then make your judgment. Deception is sometimes hard to understand when one is raised in it. One tends to draw their conclusion based on what they have been taught by a religious leader whom they trust.

Because they changed the Laws of Yahweh that were written to guide us to perfect health, peace and joy, the curse has been laid on all of mankind, the earth is defiled and nuclear wars are coming that will leave few survivors.

In commenting on what the inspired prophets wrote for this time period, the Savior gave a scenario of what we can look for. The final picture of the events we are heading into is given in the Book of Revelation. Notice the severity of what we will experience in the next thirteen months.

Mattithyah 24:21-22—
21 For then will be great tribulation, such as has not come to pass since the beginning of the world to this time—no, nor ever will be.
22 And unless those days were shortened, there would no flesh be saved; but for the elect's sake, those days will be shortened.

From what the Savior says here we see that everything shown in this chapter will be the worst ever in the history of mankind. Deception is the first thing the Savior warns us about (Mattithyah 24:4-5). Remember, this will be the worst ever. Looking at the activities of the nations, we see distinct signs of deception.

Remember, for this time period these things will be the worst ever. If mankind continues to follow this pattern, which he will, it is obvious that in the next thirteen months the deception and hatred will become worse, and the love will grow colder, which will lead to the final nuclear wars that will darken the sun.

If you come out from among these deceiving religions and be separate, repent and convert to walking in Yahweh's Way, you will understand what is coming and can prepare yourself and your family. If you do not, you will surely perish with them. From

Trouble is, people are taken in by these cults and sects and follow their prophecies as well as there ways of life which can only lead to destruction of an infinite kind which has nothing to do with men or nuclear weapons. For more on the way out there "religion" of the House of Yaweh, then see there website. Forewarned is forearmed! Trouble is, most folks have "religion" very few really have GOD.

Another Doctrinal Loon

August 13, 2006

I don't quote or mention any site to promote the teachings if heretical, merely to guard against them. As I believe it matters very much to God what we believe about Him, and that we don't have a god not revealed in the Bible and not one of our own vain imaginings. So, Dr Ray Smith may think he's doing a service by his website, but he is doing GOD a great dis-service as well as that of his own soul and also the souls of those he misleads along with himself. Scripture warnings against False Teachers No doubt that in todays world of largely "feel good" Christianity, a blog such as this would be viewed by some perhaps as "unloving" and I am the first to admit I am often blunter with words than I either intend or enjoy being, yet despite this inept blog posters ineptitude with expressing words at times in the best way, the truth is the truth for all time, and speaking it, no matter how inefficiently, can never be wrong or an unloving thing to do. Would anyone feel more hurt in their personal lives, if someone told them the truth or lied to them? Many people today seem happy to remember that God is a God of love and mercy, but conviently forget He is also a God of justice and wrath. Yet what is the one thing, God has a hatred of? So, the manner of delivery doesn't change the core or message behind it.

But folks of a delicate dispostion can rest easy now, as I am heading back to try and sleep another hour or two, to try and prevent my brain becoming as whacked out as yesterday, and when re-awkening, (DV) to have some kind of half-decent Lord's Day. Remember this day, is HIS, and HE has very specific commands on what we do with it. 1 Cor 6:20

When you say that you KNOW there is a hell, what you are saying is that you have seen the word "hell" in the KJV bible and men have interpreted for you what that word hell means. You like the idea that you and others are special and will be saved, while the majority of men women, pregnant women, little boys and little girls by the billions and billions who have NEVER EVEN HEARD OF THIS JESUS YOU ARE SPEAKING OF THAT LOVES US SOOOOO MUCH, will be put into some fabled hellhole of real fire the have their eyeballs burned out without water, without mercy, without hope, for ALL ETERNITY!!!!!

This Christian doctrine (borrowed from the most barbaric heathen and pagan religions) is the most damnable heresy to every be taught in the history of the universe. I am so utterly amazed that Christians by the million upon millions not only swallow this hogwash of satanic evil, but actually revel and gloat with joy over the idea that most of humanity will be tortured by fire for trillions and trillions and trillions and trillions and trillions and trillions (you know, Melissa, even 3-4 SECONDS of having one's flesh burned with real fire is excruciatingly painful–what human father with a CARNAL MIND even, would torture his own children by burning their flesh with FIRE. We put people like that in JAIL, but Christians WORSHIP such a fiendish monster!), and trillions and trillions and trillions and trillions and trillions of billions of quadrillions of centuries, never, ever, ever, coming to an end–pregnant women, little boys and little girls, just being burned and tortured day and night for trillions and trillions…..

And Again:

Paul didn't believe in the "trinity" and I don't think anyone would want to suggest that HE didn't have God's Holy Spirit.

<!–

–>

–>

Another Doctrinal Loon

August 13, 2006

I don't quote or mention any site to promote the teachings if heretical, merely to guard against them. As I believe it matters very much to God what we believe about Him, and that we don't have a god not revealed in the Bible and not one of our own vain imaginings. So, Dr Ray Smith may think he's doing a service by his website, but he is doing GOD a great dis-service as well as that of his own soul and also the souls of those he misleads along with himself. Scripture warnings against False Teachers No doubt that in todays world of largely "feel good" Christianity, a blog such as this would be viewed by some perhaps as "unloving" and I am the first to admit I am often blunter with words than I either intend or enjoy being, yet despite this inept blog posters ineptitude with expressing words at times in the best way, the truth is the truth for all time, and speaking it, no matter how inefficiently, can never be wrong or an unloving thing to do. Would anyone feel more hurt in their personal lives, if someone told them the truth or lied to them? Many people today seem happy to remember that God is a God of love and mercy, but conviently forget He is also a God of justice and wrath. Yet what is the one thing, God has a hatred of? So, the manner of delivery doesn't change the core or message behind it.

But folks of a delicate dispostion can rest easy now, as I am heading back to try and sleep another hour or two, to try and prevent my brain becoming as whacked out as yesterday, and when re-awkening, (DV) to have some kind of half-decent Lord's Day. Remember this day, is HIS, and HE has very specific commands on what we do with it. 1 Cor 6:20

When you say that you KNOW there is a hell, what you are saying is that you have seen the word "hell" in the KJV bible and men have interpreted for you what that word hell means. You like the idea that you and others are special and will be saved, while the majority of men women, pregnant women, little boys and little girls by the billions and billions who have NEVER EVEN HEARD OF THIS JESUS YOU ARE SPEAKING OF THAT LOVES US SOOOOO MUCH, will be put into some fabled hellhole of real fire the have their eyeballs burned out without water, without mercy, without hope, for ALL ETERNITY!!!!!

This Christian doctrine (borrowed from the most barbaric heathen and pagan religions) is the most damnable heresy to every be taught in the history of the universe. I am so utterly amazed that Christians by the million upon millions not only swallow this hogwash of satanic evil, but actually revel and gloat with joy over the idea that most of humanity will be tortured by fire for trillions and trillions and trillions and trillions and trillions and trillions (you know, Melissa, even 3-4 SECONDS of having one's flesh burned with real fire is excruciatingly painful–what human father with a CARNAL MIND even, would torture his own children by burning their flesh with FIRE. We put people like that in JAIL, but Christians WORSHIP such a fiendish monster!), and trillions and trillions and trillions and trillions and trillions of billions of quadrillions of centuries, never, ever, ever, coming to an end–pregnant women, little boys and little girls, just being burned and tortured day and night for trillions and trillions…..

And Again:

Paul didn't believe in the "trinity" and I don't think anyone would want to suggest that HE didn't have God's Holy Spirit.

<!–

–>

–>

An Arminian Quiz

August 12, 2006

A Quiz For Your Arminian Friends,
by Jay Banks

Eph. 1:11 …[W]ho [God] worketh all things after the counsel of His will.

Q. If God works all things after the counsel of His will, how much
does He work to the will of you, me, Satan, etc.?

A. None.

B. 20%

C. 50%

D. 85%

Is. 14:24 Jehovah of hosts hath sworn, saying , Surely, as I have thought, so shall it come to pass; and as I have purposed, so shall it stand.

Q. How much of what He wants to come to pass, doesn’t?

A. All of His thoughts will come to pass

B. Some of His thoughts will not come to pass

C. A few of His thoughts will not come to pass

D. A lot of His thoughts will not come to pass

Rom. 8:29 For whom He foreknew, He also foreordained to be conformed to to the image of His Son, that He might be the firstborn among many bretheren: and whom He foreordained, them He also called: and whom he called, them he also justified: and whom He justified, them He also glorified.

Q. How many do you think have been called, justified, or glorified that He did not first foreknow or foreordain?

A. Write in your answer: ___________________

John 10:14 I am the good shepherd; and I know my own, and mine own know me, even as the Father knoweth me, and I know the Father; and I lay down my life for the sheep.

Q. Where does this scripture say that Jesus laid down his life for the sheep and the goats

A. It doesn’t

B. It doesn’t, but I just know He meant the goats, too

John 6:65 No man can come unto me, except it be given unto him of the Father.

Q. How many come to Jesus that were not first given to him by the Father?

A. 0

B. 5,000

C. 5,000,000

D. 10,000,000

John 6:37 All that the Father giveth me shall come unto me

Q. How many that the Father gave Him will not come to Him?

A. Two

B. A couple of thousand

C. A couple of million

D. Trick question, it says they will all come unto him

John 10:28 I [Jesus] give unto them the (true followers, or ‘sheep’) eternal life; and they shall never perish, and no one shall snatch them out of my hand. My Father, who hath given them unto me, is greater than all; and no one is able to snatch them out of the Father’s hand.

Q. How many sheep do you think have been snatched from either God’s or Jesus’ hands?

A. None

B. 50,000

C. 500,000

D. 1,000,000

Rev. 13:8 And all that dwell upon the earth shall worship him, whose names are not written in the book of life of the Lamb slain from the foundation of the world. Rev. 20:15 And whosoever was not found written in the book of life was cast into the lake of fire.

Q. Considering this, and other related scripture, God having to blot out a name from the book of life would mean:

A. God makes mistakes.

B. Some have been snatched from Jesus’ hands?

C. God didn’t know that some of His sheep were really goats.

D. None of the above.

Q. Could a person whose name was written in the book of life from the foundation of the world not have become a Christian (or have saving faith in God if born before Jesus)?

A. No

B. Yes

C. This confuses me, but I’m going to believe the Bible.

D. This confuses me, and I’m going to pretend this isn’t in the Bible (be honest).

Matt. 13 10 And the disciples came, and said unto him, Why speakest thou unto them in parables? 11 He answered and said unto them, Because it is given unto you to know the mysteries of the kingdom of heaven, but to them it is not given.

Q. Jesus himself declared that one of the reasons why He spoke in parables was that the truth might be concealed from whom it was not intended. Is this fair?

A. No.

B. Yes.

C. Who are we to question God?

D. I’m going to pretend I didn’t see that verse.

Rom. 8:28 To them that love God all things work together for good, even to them that are called according to His purpose.

Q. How many things do not work for the good of those who love God?

A. 10% of all things

B. 40% of all things

C. 85% of all things

D. Trick question, the Bible says all things work for the good of those who love Him

Mark 14:30 And Jesus said unto him (Peter), Verily I say unto thee, that thou, today, even this night before the cock crow twice shall deny me thrice.

Questions:

A. Could Peter not have denied Jesus three times before the cock crowed twice?

Answer here: ____________________________

B. Did Jesus make Peter deny him, or did Peter do it of his own free will?

Answer here: ____________________________

Exodus 4:11 [God Himself asks the rhetorical question] Who gave man his mouth? Who makes him deaf or dumb? Who gives him his sight or makes him blind? Is it not I the Lord?

Q. Is this fair?

A. Yes.

B. No.

C. Who are we to question God?

D. I’m going to pretend this isn’t in the Bible.

Copyright 1998,

The Author of Scripture

August 3, 2006

Q:Why must a book which gives all glory to God be genuine?

A: It must be genuine, that is, it must be what it claims to be, the Word of God, because no one but God could have had a motive for writing it. Wicked men would not write a book which condemnsness and gives all glory to a holy, sin-hating God. Good men could not write a book of their own initiative and represent it falsely as the Word of God, for if they did that they would be decievers, and therefore not good men. For the same reaons, neither devils or holy angels could have written it. Therefor God is the only person who could be the Author of the Bible. [Johannes G. Vos]